心理健康自评问卷在地震灾区学生中使用的信效度  

Reliabioity and validity of Self-Reporting Questionnaire(SRQ-20)in high school students in Wenchuan earthquake area

作　　者：江新会[1,2] 王桢[1,2] 王筱璐[3] 时勘[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100049 [3]香港大学行为健康教研中心

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2010年第4期313-317,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：国家自然科学基金委员会重大项目<非常规突发事件的应急管理>培育项目(90924007);国家自然科学基金面上项目"公共危机事件中民众的社会心理行为预警模型及管理对策"(70573108)

摘　　要：目的:检验心理健康自评问卷(self-reporting questionaire 20,SRQ-20)中文版的信效度。方法:在地震发生3周后,向675名都江堰市高三学生施测了SRQ-20和贝克抑郁量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition,BDI-Ⅱ)。用Kuder-Richardson公式计算SRQ-20内部一致性系数。计算各个项目与总分的点二列相关。用探索性因素分析检测SRQ-20的因子结构。用SRQ-20和BDI-Ⅱ的相关进行聚合效度的检验。结果:KR-20系数为0.79。项目和总分的相关在0.34到0.60之间,平均达到了0.48。SRQ-20和BDI-Ⅱ之间的相关为0.70。探索性因素分析得到4个因子,解释总方差的43.96%。除了项目1和5,其他项目的因子载荷均高于或接近0.40。结论:心理健康自评问卷的一致性信度和效标关联效度良好,但其因子结构尚不稳定,暂不适宜将其因子当作子量表应用,而应视为单维处理。Objective： To provide information about some of the psychometric characteristics of Self-Reporring Questionnaire （ SRQ-20, Chinese version） . Methods： The Chinese verison of SRQ-20 and Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition （ BDI- Ⅱ ） were administered to 675 students who were about to take the national college en： trance exam in Dujiangyan city, three weeks after the earthquake. Kuder-Richardson formulation was employed to estimate the inter-consistency of SRQ-20. And point-biserial correlation was calculated to indicate the item-total consistency. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factorial construct. Moreover, the test of the association between the scores of SRQ-20 and BDI- Ⅱ was used to provide evidence of convergent construct of this instrument Results： The KR-20 coefficient of the scale was 0. 79. The item-total score correlations varied from 0. 34 to 0. 60, averagely reached 0. 48. The correlation between the score of SRQ-20 and BDI- was 0. 70. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a four-factor construct which explained 43.96% of total variance. Except item 1 and 5, the factor loading of the remained items were more than or near to 0. 40. Conclusion： The results suggest the consistency relia- bility and criteria validity of Chinese SRQ-20 are adequate. However, the results of factor analysis from different re- searches are not consistent. This impfies that-itS more advisable to regard the scale as one-dimension rather than use the factor structure as sub-scales.

关 键 词：心理健康自评问卷 中学生 信度 效度 心理测量学研究 

分 类 号：B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] R749.5[哲学宗教—心理学]