我国行政诉讼制度中的举证责任分配规则——与日本相关学说相比较  

Distribution Rules of Burden of Proof in the Administrative Suits system of China——Comparison with related theory in Japan

作　　者：吴东镐[1] 

机构地区：[1]延边大学法学院,吉林延吉133002

出　　处：《东疆学刊》2010年第2期88-93,共6页Dongjiang Journal

摘　　要：举证责任分配规则直接左右着审判的最终结果,也直接影响着行政诉讼制度本身所具有的权利救济功能的发挥。我国行政诉讼法确立了较为详细的举证责任分配制度,提出了各种不同情形下的举证责任的分配规则,具有可操作性。但这些规定只能说是提供了举证责任分配的"基本框架",并没有详尽提出适应所有情形的完整的"分配规则"。日本的举证责任分配学说的发展与实务动向给我们的启示是:应当以"个别具体说"为"举证责任分配"的指导理念,应立足于"依据形式与实质标准的举证责任分配说"。Distribution rules of burden of proof directly control the final results of the trial and also directly influence the right relief function of the administrative suits system. More detailed distribution rules of burden of proof are determined in the administrative litigation law of China. Distribution rules suitable for various conditions are put forward, which can be put into practice. These rules, however, just provide a basic framework for the distribution of burden of proof, without a complete distribution rule suitable for all of the situations. The enlightenment of Japanese distribution theory of burden of proof to China is that： Individualization and Concretization Theory should be regarded as the guide idea of the distribution of burden of proof. We should base the distribution theory of burden of proof upon the unity of form and essence.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 举证责任 分配规则 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]