宪法性居住权在我国的民法实现途径——面向土地的“公产”取向  

The Realization Path of Constitutional Residential Rights in China under the Civil Law Framework——The orientation of land to publicly owned properties

作　　者：张力[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《河北法学》2010年第6期2-10,共9页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目<改革发展成果分享法律机制研究>(05&ZD029)子课题:<土地利益改革成果分享机制研究>;重庆市教委人文社会科学研究项目<城乡统筹背景下重庆市土地储备制度完善研究>(08JWSKO17)研究成果

摘　　要：居住权制度在我国民事(物权)立法过程中最终被废黜,既反映了传统民法中的,微观意义上的居住权制度本身在当代中国社会意义的欠缺,又反映出我国物权法完全排斥居住权观念的极端性。尤其在物权法宣誓了"公有制"的基本原则之后,创造性地发展罗马法以来的居住权,就成为当代中国物权法参与营造和谐社会的,当仁不让的制度功能。其体现即是以宪法之维中的居住权观念,统帅物权制度,面向土地的"公产"取向,以公众居住利益实现为基础进行地权制度的改良。Residential rights were finally abolished in the process of civil law legislation, reflecting that traditional proprietary rights still has deficiency in miero residential rights in Chinese society, and also reflecting the extreme of Chinese proprietary rights in excluding residential rights. Especially after proprietary rights announcing its obedience under public ownership, creatively developing residential rights under Roman law framework has become the unique function of Chinese proprietary rights in building harmonic society. Its incarnation is using constitutional residential rights to lead proprietary rights law, with an orientation of land to publicly owned properties, and successfully reforming the land right system for public residential benefits.

关 键 词：居住权 微观 宏观 物权法保护 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]