检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩冰[1] 刘春民[1] 贾惠莉[1] 周凤[1] 邓宏伟[1]
机构地区:[1]中国广东省深圳市眼科医院暨南大学附属深圳眼科医院,518040
出 处:《国际眼科杂志》2010年第4期816-817,共2页International Eye Science
摘 要:目的:探讨集合不足型间歇性外斜视采用不同手术方式对疗效的影响。方法:对98例记录资料完整的集合不足型间歇性外斜视分为两组,A组(49例)以减弱外直肌为主设计手术,B组(49例)以加强内直肌为主设计手术,并于术后1a内定期随访,进行疗效分析。结果:手术后1a正位率总体为88%。A组为86%,B组为90%,两组治愈率之间差异无统计学意义。术后的集合功能比较,两组集合近点之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:间歇性外斜视手术采用加强内直肌或减弱外直肌为主手术,均可取得较好疗效。以加强内直肌为主手术,术后集合功能恢复更好。AIM: To discuss the effect of different surgical methods effect on convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia. METHODS: Ninety-eight recorded patients with convergence insufficiency intermittent exotropia were categorized into two groups. Group A was with the operations based on weakening procedure of the abductor oculi, group B with strengthening procedure of adducens oculi.Curative effects were analyzed in one year's regular follow-up examinations. RESULTS: One year after surgery, the total correction rale was 88%, 86% in group A and 90% in group B. There were no obvious differences. From the comparison on convergence, group B was better than group A (P〈0.05). CONCLUSION: The good surgical effect will be got based on either weakening procedure of the abductor oculi or strengthening procedure of adducens oculi, but the convengence will be better with strengthening procedure of adducens oculi.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3