检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何志高[1] 鲍思蔚[1] 翟晓波[1] 张小刚[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属东方医院药学部,上海市200120
出 处:《中国药房》2010年第14期1299-1302,共4页China Pharmacy
基 金:2008年度上海医院药学科研基金-肿瘤药学专项(2008-YY-0225)
摘 要:目的:评价奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(5-FU/LV)方案与伊立替康联合5-FU/LV方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与毒副作用的差异。方法:在PubMed数据库和CHKD数据库上检索2组方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的随机对照试验,采用荟萃分析专用软件Review Manager version4.2.2进行系统评价。结果:共有6个研究纳入系统评价。在总缓解率上奥沙利铂组高于伊立替康组(RR=0.82,95%CI为0.74~0.91);伊立替康组中性粒细胞减少发生率低于奥沙利铂组(RR=0.79,95%CI为0.69~0.90),在恶心/呕吐和腹泻的发生率上高于奥沙利铂组(RR=1.85,95%CI为1.42~2.40;RR=1.75,95%CI为1.41~2.17)。结论:奥沙利铂联合5-FU/LV方案在晚期结直肠癌的治疗中优于伊立替康联合5-FU/LV方案。OBJECTIVE:To evaluate clinical efficacy and toxicities of oxaliplatin or irinotecan combined with 5-FU/LV for advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS:RCTs were retrieved from PubMed database and CHKD and Metaanalysis was carried out using Review Manager version 4.2.2 software. RESULTS:Six studies were enrolled. The oxaliplatin group was superior to irinotecan group in the overall response rate(RR=0.82,95%CI ranged from 0.74 to 0.91). The incidence rate of neutropenia in irinote-can group was lower than in oxaliplatin group(RR=0.79,95%CI ranged from 0.69 to 0.90)while the incidence of nausea/vomiting and diarrhea in irinotecan group was higher than in oxaliplatin group(RR=1.85,95%CI ranged from 1.42 to 2.40;RR=1.75, 95%CI ranged from 1.41 to 2.17). CONCLUSION:The scheme oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU/LV in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer is superior to the scheme irinotecan combined with 5-FU/LV.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7