检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴存才[1] 杜竞辉[1] 刘训良[1] 苗毅[1] 张兆松[2] 苏川[2]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院普外科,210029 [2]南京医科大学分子生物学研究所,210029
出 处:《外科理论与实践》1998年第2期98-99,107,共3页Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice
摘 要:目的:探索细针抽吸活组织检查(FNAB)和PCR-SSP协同检测对胰腺良恶性肿块鉴别及对胰腺癌的诊断价值.方法:对35例胰腺癌、12例正常胰腺组织、26例胰腺良性疾病、8例壶腹癌及7例胆管癌行FNAB,并对FNAB吸出物行PCR-SSP检测K-ras基因有无突变.结果:FNAB对胰腺癌的确诊率为57.1%(20/35),对壶腹癌及胆管癌的确诊率分别为4/8(50)和4/7(5.1%);PCR-SSP对胰腺癌的确诊率为91.4%(32/35),对壶腹癌及胆管癌的确诊率皆为零.结论:FNAB与PCR-SSP协同检测有助于确诊胰腺癌;PCR-SSP对壶腹癌及胆管癌的诊断价值不大.Objective: To assess the value of FNAB together with PCR-SSP in the differentiation of pancreatic benign and malignant nodules, and in the definitive diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: FNAB was carried out in 35 cases of pancreatic carcinoma, 12 cases of normal pancreatic tissue, 26 cases with benign pancreatic diseases, 8 cases of ampullary carcinoma and 7 cases of bile duct carcinoma; also, the aspirated material underwent detection for K-ras gene mutations by PCR-SSP. Results: In theFNAB group, the correct diagnosis rate (CDR) of pancreatic carcinoma was 57.1%(20/35), that of ampullary carcinoma and bile duct carcinoma were 4/8(50%) 和 4/7(57.1%), respectively. In the FNAB associated with PCR-SSP group, the CDR of pancreatic carcinoma was 91.4%(32/35), but that for both ampullary carcinoma and bile duct carcinoma were zero. Conclusions: FNAB combined with PCR-SSP yield a higher accurate diagnosis rate for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, while PCR-SSP is not useful for the diagnosis of ampullary and bile duct carcinoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222