检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶广峰[1]
出 处:《经济经纬》2010年第2期152-156,160,共6页Economic Survey
基 金:国家司法部"国家法治与法学理论研究"课题(06SFB2053)的阶段成果之一
摘 要:公益诉讼旨在维护公共利益,但我国司法实践中,公益诉讼大多以原告不享有诉权即"不具备原告诉讼主体资格"被裁定驳回起诉或判决驳回诉讼请求。在我国建立公益诉讼制度势在必行。律师作为社会中的一员,自然也应是公共利益的享有者,应可以充当公益诉讼的原告。律师作为特殊群体,具有专业知识等诉讼能力和独特的价值追求,对完善公益诉讼制度有重大意义。当然,在构建律师参与和提起公益诉讼的原告资格制度的同时,也应对律师参与和提起公益诉讼予以适当激励和约束。The purpose of public interest litigation is to protect public interests. However, public interest litigation is always nonsuited or rejected in Chinese judicial practice because the plaintiff doesn' t have the right to sue. It is imperative to establish the system of public interest litigation in our country. As members of the society, lawyers share public interests and should be able to act as the plaintiff in public interest litigation.. As a special group, lawyers can play an important role in perfecting the system of public interest litigation because of their professional knowledge and litigation ability and unique pursuit of value. Of course, in the construction of the system in which lawyers have the qualification of plaintiff in public interest litigation, lawyers' participating in and initiate publio interest litigation should be inspired and restricted appropriately.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3