《尚书孔传》成书问题新探  

A New Research into the Making of the SHANGSHU KONGZHUAN

作　　者：陈以凤[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学历史文化学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《史学史研究》2010年第1期86-93,共8页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<汉晋孔氏家学及"伪书"公案>(编号06BZS004)

摘　　要：《尚书孔传》的作者及成书问题是长期以来学界争讼的焦点。通过《孔传》与《小尔雅》两书释词的比较研究,证实了孔安国确曾训解古文《尚书》,且其解经成果被收入《小尔雅》。而从"传"字本义、与《孔丛子》的联系、孔氏家学传承等方面看,今本《孔传》当是包括孔安国在内的孔家学者的集体作品,是汉代孔氏家学的产物。The authorship and the making of the SHANGSHU KONGZHUAN have long been focuses of disputation among scholars.This article argues that Kong Anguo actually annotated GUWEN SHANGSHU after a comparison between KONGZHUAN and XIAOERYA through explanation of the words.His research works have been collected into XIAOERYA.According to the original meaning of the word Zhuan,the relation of KONGZHUAN to KONGCONGZI,and the succession of the Confucius＇ family learning,the new version of KONGZHUAN should be a collective work by the scholars in the Confucius＇ family and the crystal of the Confucius＇ family learning in the Han Dynasty.

关 键 词：《尚书孔传》 成书 孔安国 孔氏家学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]