检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤霞靖[1] 姚克[1] 徐雯[1] 申屠形超[1] 陈佩卿[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第二医院眼科中心,杭州310009
出 处:《中华眼科杂志》2010年第4期328-331,共4页Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的比较零像差设计的非球面人工晶状体(IOL)与传统球面IOL对超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术后患者眼球差、视觉功能以及表观调节力的影响。方法采用前瞻性随机对照设计,将130例(132只眼)拟行超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术的年龄相关性白内障患者按随机数字表法分为2组,分别植入零像差设计的非球面IOL(试验组)和传统球面IOL(对照组)。术后检测IOL眼的球差、矫正远视力、矫正远视力后的近视力、对比敏感度、眩光敏感度及表观调节力;随访时间为3个月。采用χ^2检验和独立样本t检验分别对计数资料和计量资料进行统计学分析。结果术后3个月,瞳孔直径5mm情况下IOL眼的球差试验组为(0.141±0.070)μm,对照组为(0.210±0.108)μm,差异有统计学意义(t=4.365,P=0.000)。2.5°视角的对比敏感度试验组为30.62±12.50,对照组为25.92±7.36,差异有统计学意义(t=2.606,P=0.010);眩光敏感度在4.0°、2.5°及1.6°视角上分别为31.25±8.65、26.35±8.72和12.35±4.01,显著高于对照组在相应视角上的26.70±7.98(t=3.116,P=0.002)、22.43±7.35(t=2.772,P=0.006)及9.82±4.12(t=3.553,P=0.001);两组的矫正远视力、矫正远视力后近视力、表观调节力比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论与传统球面IOL比较,零像差的非球面IOLAkreosAO可以显著减少IOL眼的总球差,改善白内障患者术后的视觉质量,且对患者术后的表观调节力无明显影响。Objective To compare spherical aberration, visual quality and apparent accommodation between pseudophakic patients with an aberration-free aspherie intraocular lens (IOL) and patients with a spherical IOL. Methods A prospective study of 130 consecutive cases (132 eyes) was conducted. All cataract patients underwent phacoemulsification were randomized to receive an aberration-free aspheric IOL (Akreos AO, Bausch & Lomb) or a spherical IOL (KS-l, Cannon Staar). Spherical aberration of total eye, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), near visual acuity (NVA), contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and apparent aecommodation were measured. Data were analyzed using chl-square test and independent t-test. Results The mean spherical aberration in eyes with a Tecnis IOL [ (0. 141 ±0. 070)μm] was significantly lower than that of eyes with a spherical IOL [ (0. 210 ± 0. 108 )μm; t = 4. 365, P = 0. 000 ]. In addition, Akreos AO IOL provided a better contrast sensitivity at 2. 5° visual angle (30. 62 ± 12. 50 vs. 25. 92°7. 36; t =2.606, P=0.010), and improved glare sensitivity at 4.0°(31.25 ±8.65 vs. 26.70 ±7.98;t =3. 116, P=0.002), 2.5° (26.35±8.72 vs. 22.43±7.35;t =2.772, P=0.006) and 1.6° (12.35 ±4.01 vs. 9. 82 ± 4. 12; t = 3. 553, P = 0.001 ) visual angles. The difference of BCVA, NVA and apparent accommodation between these two groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion The present results demonstrated that an aberration-free aspheric IOL, Akreos AO, may reduce the spherieal aberration and improve visual performance of pseudophakic eyes and without negative influence on apparent accommodation as compare to conventional spherieal IOL .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249