证据制度网络视野中的测谎结论——以证据能力和证明力为中心的考察  

System Dimension of Polygraph Conclusion:Hovering Between Ideal and Reality

作　　者：张峰[1] 蔡永彤[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学法学院,上海市200086 [2]上海市闵行区人民检察院,上海市201100

出　　处：《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期93-98,共6页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：科学的发展使得诉讼证明的科技含量越来越高,并日益冲击着我们的证据制度。测谎技术作为查明真相、揭发谎言的一项里程碑式的发明,对案件事实的证明发挥着重要的作用。但国内外理论界对测谎技术的应用、测谎结论的法律地位仍众说纷纭,莫衷一是。测谎技术在我国司法实践中已大量使用,但现行法律却未对其法律属性加以规范,这不仅使测谎结论的适用无法可依,也制约了测谎技术的进一步发展。With the development of modern science and technology, scientific evidence has been widely used in judicial procedure with increasing impact on the evidence rules. Polygraph test is a milestone in human history of revealing truth, and plays an important role in fact detection and proof. But the application of polygraph and legal status of the conclusion are still under dispute. Although polygraph test has been widely used in China＇s judicial practice, the existing law does not regulate it. There are no norms on testing personnel as well as the admissibility rules. It leads to the disorder of polygraph application and holdback the advancement of the technology in judicial proceedings.

关 键 词：证据制度 测谎结论 证据能力 证据价值 证明力 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]