检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院人力资源部,成都610041 [2]四川大学人事处,成都610065
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2010年第5期631-633,共3页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨卫生专业技术职务评聘的指标及机制。方法收集华西医院获得高级职称员工的资料及历年高级职称评审文件,总结分析卫生专业技术职务评聘的主要指标及机制现状。结果 2003~2009年四川大学华西医院共有400名员工获得高级职称。评价指标包括学历、著作、科研项目、专利申报及获奖情况5个方面。有80%的高级职称获得者在取得高级卫生专业技术职务评聘后论文发表及科研业绩均有下降。结论当前评聘指标存在重硬件轻软件、重视科研忽视临床和教学工作的问题;评聘机制存在只上不下,缺乏后效评价的问题。今后针对卫生专业技术职务评聘的特点,应进一步完善评价指标和聘用机制。Objective To explore the evaluation index and appointment mechanism of healthy professional titles. Methods We collected the data of people evaluated and appointed as advanced professional titles, and the evaluation and appointment documents in West China Hospital. We analyzed the evaluation index and appointment mechanism. Results A total of 400 people gained senior title promotion. The evaluation indexes focused on academic degrees, papers, research projects, patents, as well as awards and honors. The research achievements reduced of 80% people who had gained senior titles. Conclusion Current evaluation indexes prefer to inflexible index and ignore flexible index. The appointment mechanism lacks outcome evaluation, and the professional title will not be eliminated once appointed. In the future, we should improve the evaluation index and appointment mechanism focusing on the specific characteristics of healthy professional titles.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49