检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州省农业科学院,贵州贵阳550006 [2]湖南吉首大学,湖南吉首416000
出 处:《青海民族研究》2010年第2期72-75,共4页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
基 金:湖南吉首大学国际福特基金环境与发展研究项目<中国西部各民族地方性生态知识的发掘;传承;推广及利用研究>阶段性成果之一;批准号:1076-0877
摘 要:评估生物污染的受害程度,必须从民族文化出发,并因民族而异,不同的民族对待同一污染物种具有截然不同的态度,因此,各民族评估生物污染的受害程度也不相同。本文通过分析苗族对待紫茎泽兰和傣族对待橡胶树这两个案例来证实上述观点,并呼吁建立不同的评价标准,才能实事求是地反映生物污染对我国造成的损失,同时为制定防治生物污染的法律法规提供参考依据。The argument of this study is that assessing the extent of biological contamination must start from the culture point of view and varies by ethnic groups. Different ethnic groups have different kinds of attitude and philosophy in dealing with the same pollutants, therefore, their assessments on extent of the same biological contamination are different. This article validates this point of view by citing two case studies on analyzing how Miao ethnic minority is coping with the entrance of Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng and how Dai ethnic minority is fighting with the entrance of rubber plant. Meanwhile, the author calls on it is only through establishment of different evaluation criteria that could realistically reflect our loss in biological pollution, by which provides a reference for the formulation of prevention and control of biological pollution laws and regulations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15