检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院口腔修复科,青岛2007级硕士研究生266003 [2]青岛大学医学院口腔修复技工中心
出 处:《北京口腔医学》2010年第2期97-99,共3页Beijing Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的研究快速和慢速包埋方法对铸造全冠精度的影响。方法在同一模具上制作36个熔模冠,随机分为6组,分别用3个厂家的磷酸盐包埋材料进行快速包埋和慢速包埋。测定各组铸造冠的边缘浮升量。结果慢速包埋组铸造冠的平均边缘浮升量为41.67±3.94μm,快速包埋组铸造冠的平均边缘浮升量为96.63±7.46μm,两组间的差别有统计学意义。结论慢速包埋方法比快速包埋方法制作的铸造冠边缘浮升量小,铸造精度高。Objective To investigate the effect of quick-heating investing method and slow-heating investing method on cast accuracy.Methods Thirty-six resin crowns were prepared on the same standard mold.They were then randomly divided into six groups.Each group was invested with 3 different phosphate-bonded investments.According to the different time from setting to heating,castings were designed for quick-heating method groups and slow-heating method groups.Then the marginal precision of the crowns was measured.Results The average marginal precision of slow-heating method group and quick-heating method group was 41.67±3.94μm and 96.63±7.46μm respectively.There was significant difference of precision between the two groups.Conclusion The marginal precision of slow-heating methods group was smaller than the quick-heating method and the slow-heating method was more accurate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.93.250