故意杀人行为的类型化考量  

Typed Thinking of Intentional Homicide Acts

作　　者：颜超明[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《福建警察学院学报》2010年第2期58-63,共6页Journal of Fujian Police College

摘　　要：故意杀人行为的定罪量刑是一个十分复杂的工程,而我国刑法却只予以了简单的规定,致使实践中出现同案不同判或本应以故意杀人罪评价的行为却在其他罪中评价,主要原因之一是缺乏"类型化"的方法论指导。在我国对故意杀人行为进行类型化,有其历史基础和国外经验的借鉴;并且有其现实意义,即有利于我国故意杀人罪量刑基准的确定,有利于从立法上消减死刑条款,有利于处理《刑法》第17条第2款在司法实践中的问题,有利于弥补对行为评价的不足。The conviction and sentencing of intentional homicide acts is a very complex and ambitious project; but it appears as only a simple provision of criminal law in China, which leads to different subcontractor of a case, or the misjudgment of a crime that should have been evaluated in intentional homicide acts. One of the reasons is the lack of the guide of the typed methodology. In our nation, the type intentional homicide acts has its historical basis and foreign experience. And it will be beneficial to the determination of the baseline of voluntary manslaughter sentencing. It also will be beneficial to reduce the death penalty provisions on legislation and deal with the problems of paragraph 2 of Article XVII in the Criminal Code.

关 键 词：故意杀人 类型化 定罪 量刑 

分 类 号：D918.2[政治法律—法学]