司法解释的错位与回归——以法律解释权的配置为切入点  

The Misplacement and Regression of Judicial Interpretation:Taking the Allocation of Legal Interpretation Power As the Pointcut

作　　者：魏胜强[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2010年第3期56-65,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部2009年度人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"法律解释权的配置研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:09YJC820109

摘　　要：法官在个案中作出解释是法律解释活动规律的必然要求,是我国司法活动复杂性的客观需要,是消除我国司法活动中诸多弊端的有效措施。要保障法官在个案中作出法律解释,就必须建立一支高素质的法官队伍,并为法官独立审判提供良好的环境。最高人民法院作出统一解释,是维护我国法制统一的需要,是法官在个案中寻求权威性解释的需要,是最高人民法院司法权威的体现。可以考虑在最高人民法院内部设置大法官会议,按照严格的程序,专职作出统一的法律解释。In China＇s current legal interpretation system, the judicial interpretation power is held by the supreme court, and its activity does not comply with the law and leads to the misplacement of judicial interpretation. Considering this conditions, some scholars put forward that the judge interprets law in individual case and the supreme court works out uniform interpretation is rational and practicable. Judges interpretation in individual case is the inevitable requirement of the regulation of legal interpretation, the desirability of the complexity of judicial activity, and the effective measure to eliminate the abuse malpractice. In order to ensure the individual interpretation, a class of high - calibre judges should be estab-lished and a fine environment for independent adjudication should be supplied. The supreme court＇s uniform interpretation is the requirement to protect the uniform of law, aiming to provide authoritative interpretation for individual judge, and the expression of the authority of the supreme court. The establishment of Council of Grand Justices who works out uniform interpretation exclusively under strict procedures in the supreme court should be considered.

关 键 词：司法解释 法律解释权 个案解释 统一解释 

分 类 号：DF821[政治法律—法学]