检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州医学院附属广州市精神病医院,510370
出 处:《广州医药》2010年第3期11-12,共2页Guangzhou Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较文拉法辛与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性。方法将80例抑郁症患者随机分为文拉法辛(40例)和帕罗西汀(40例),疗程6周,用汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项(HAMD)评定疗效,治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定不良反应和安全性。结果文拉法辛组治疗1周起效,疗程结束时两组疗效和HAMD评分差异无显著性,不良反应少而轻。结论文拉法辛与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症疗效相似,文拉法辛起效快。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Velafaxine and Paroxetine in the treatment of depression. Methods Eighty patients with depression were randomly divided into Venlafaxine group or Paroxetine group and then received treatment for 6 weeks. The efficacy was assessed using Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD) and treatment e- mergent symptom scale (TESS) . Results The Venlafaxine group showed treatment effect at week 1. There were no significant differences in the efficacy and HAMD scores between two groups at the treatment end. The side effects of both group were few and slight. Conclusion Venlafaxine and Paroxetine are both effective in the treatment of depressive episode. Venlafaxinehave earlier response.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.180