检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱琦[1,2] 刘冬梅[1] 崔福义[1] 方蕾[3] 王睿[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室,哈尔滨150090 [2]黑龙江大学化学化工与材料学院,哈尔滨150080 [3]哈尔滨学院生命科学与化学学院,哈尔滨150086
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报》2010年第6期904-906,共3页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50808052);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(50821002)
摘 要:为了比较活性炭与生物活性炭对溴酸盐的去除效果,采用水厂中试模型试验考察了活性炭表面的生物量及溴酸盐去除率的变化.结果表明:新鲜活性炭对溴酸盐的去除率为57.1%,在活性炭向生物活性炭转化的过程中,随着活性炭表面生物量的增加,炭柱对溴酸盐的去除效果逐渐提高.经过8个月的中试模型连续运行,溴酸盐的去除率提高至75.4%,成熟生物活性炭对溴酸盐的去除效果稳定,从而证明生物活性炭比活性炭更有利于溴酸盐的去除.In order to compare the bromate removal effect of activated carbon with that of biological activated t carbon, by making pilot-scale test, the changes of biomass on activated carbon surface and bromate removal rate were investigated. The results indicated that the bromate removal rate of new activated carbon was 57. 1%, and as the biomass increased, the removal effect of bromate was improved gradually during transformation process from granular activated carbon to biological activated carbon. After 8 months, the bromate removal rate achieved 75.4% and the concentration of bromate could be controlled by biological activated carbon steadily, which proved that bioIogical activated carbon was more suitable for bromate removal than granular activated carbon.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185