检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海同济大学口腔医学院,200072 [2]江苏省昆山市中医医院口腔科
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2010年第3期341-344,共4页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:研究拔牙矫治对年轻成年错畸形患者上气道大小的影响,探讨牙齿位置及颌面形态变化与上气道大小之间的相关性。方法:随机选择26例拔除4个第一前磨牙和21例未拔牙的错畸形患者,测量矫治前后的X线头颅定位侧位片及牙模型,将测量数据进行配对t检验,单因素相关分析及多因素回归分析。结果:拔牙组和非拔牙组经治疗后,软腭后气道间隙(SPAS)、软腭尖后气道间隙(MAS)及舌根后气道间隙(IAS)均无显著变化(P>0.05)。单因素相关分析结果显示SPAS改变量与U1-Y距、L1-Y距改变量呈正相关;MAS及IAS改变量与SNB角、U1-Y距、L1-Y距改变量呈正相关。多因素回归分析结果显示U1-Y距改变量与SPAS及IAS改变量有显著的正相关关系,L1-Y距改变量与SPAS及MAS改变量有显著的正相关关系。结论:拔牙矫治未引起上气道大小的明显改变,但切牙位置改变与上气道大小改变有显著相关性。Objective:To investigate the effects of extraction orthodontic treatment on the upper airway dimensions in young adult patients with malocclusion,and to evaluate the relationship between changes in the craniofacial morphology,position of incisor and upper airway dimensions.Methods:26 patients with upper and lower first premolar extraction and 21 patients without extraction were recruited.Cephalometry and dental cast analysis were performed pretreatment and posttreatment.Results:No statistical difference was found in the parameters of the upper airway dimensions in both non-extraction group and extraction group after treatment.In linear correlation analysis,SPAS was positively correlated with cephalometric variables U1-Y and L1-Y.MAS and IAS was positively correlated with cephalometric variables SNB,U1-Y and L1-Y.The multiple regression analysis revealed that the change of U1-Y had a significant positive effect on SPAS and IAS,and the change of L1-Y also had a significant positive effect on SPAS and MAS.Conclusion:The upper airway dimensions can not be altered during extraction orthodontic treatment,while the changes of incisors are significant associated with the change of the upper airway dimensions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249