检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁靖[1]
出 处:《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》2010年第5期40-43,共4页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
摘 要:利率期限结构的估计主要有两种分析方法:回归分析方法和无套利分析方法。利用我国上交所国债数据,选用参数模型比较分析了CS模型和AFG模型、AFSV模型的利率预测能力,结果发现AFG模型、AFSV模型对利率期限结构的三因子拟合效果优于CS模型,嵌入动态无套利分析的利率预测模型会产生整体更小的偏差。There are two main analysis methods to estimate the term structure of interest rates : regres- sion analysis and no-arbitrage analysis. Using China' s SSE debt data and selecting parameter models, this paper does comparative analysis on the CS model( allowing arbitrage opportunities), and the pre- dictive power of interest rates of AFG model, AFSV model ( excluding arbitrage opportunities). The results show that the three-factor fitting effects of AFG model, AFSV model on the term of interest rate are superior to those of CS model, and the model, which is embedded in the analysis of the dynamic no-arbitrage, has a smaller overall error of interest rate predicting ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62