检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢慧[1]
出 处:《现代法学》2010年第3期152-158,共7页Modern Law Science
摘 要:人格权是私人享有的权利,而私人权利又可分为公权利和私权利两个方面。"公众人物"的人格权主要涉及私法与其私权利的一面。"公众人物"的人格权与一般人的人格权并无不同,现有的限制理论均有缺憾。故我们仅需界定人格权本身而无需对其主体进行分类。不必建立"公众人物"法律概念,在人格平等的私法理念下各类主体不应被区别对待。Personality rights, enjoyed by an individual, are generally consists of tow sorts of rights : right of publicity and right of privacy. For public figures, personality rights problems chiefly arise out of or pertain to private law and right of privacy. Indeed, no discrepancy exists between the personality rights of public figure and those of ordinary people, for which the constraints theory seems of defects. As such, what we should do is to define personality rights per se rather that itemize those who enjoy them and there is no need to develop a legal concept of "public figure. " Under the notion of equality of personality in private law, no one shall be treated distinctively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249