检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪丽蓉[1] 狄海波[2] 陈波[1] 沈国理[1] 喻森明[1] 汪婧平[1] 祝宇平[1]
机构地区:[1]武警浙江总队杭州医院,浙江杭州310051 [2]浙江大学医学院生理系,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《武警医学院学报》2010年第5期348-350,共3页Acta Academiae Medicinae CPAPF
基 金:浙江省科技厅国际科技合作研究重大专项基金资助项目(2008C14098)
摘 要:【目的】探观察脑波治疗仪治疗脑性昏迷患者的临床疗效。【方法】脑性昏迷患者随机分为对照组40例和脑波治疗组40例,对照组给予常规治疗,脑波治疗组在常规治疗的基础上辅以脑波治疗仪治疗,根据昏迷恢复量表(coma recoveryscale-revised,CRS-R)评分判断临床疗效。【结果】脑波治疗组CRS-R由(5.6±1.9)增至(12.4±4.5);对照组CRS-R由(5.2±1.7)增至(9.6±4.80);脑波治疗仪的临床有效率为70.0%;对照组为40.0%;脑波组的平均促醒时间为(22.1±7.8)d,对照组为(26.9±4.8)d,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。【结论】脑波治疗仪辅助治疗对脑性昏迷患者具有良好的促醒作用。[Objective] To investigate the efficacy of brain-care apparatus in treatment of brain coma. [Methods] 80 patients in brain coma were randomly divided into two groups, which were given routine therapy (40 cases) or brain-care apparatus therapy plus routine therapy (40 cases). Coma recovery seale-revised(CRS-R) score was used to assess the efficacy of these therapies. [Results] CRS-R score was increased from (5.6±1.9) to (12.4±4.5 in in group with brain-care therapy. In control group, CRS-R score was increased from (5.2±1.7) to (9.6±4.8). The effective rate was 70.0% in brain-care therapy plus routine therapy group while 40.0% in control group. The average time of conscious recovery was (22.1±7.8) d in group with brain-care therapy, while (26.9±4.8) d in control group. There was significantly difference between two groups(P 0.05). [Conclusions] Brain-care apparatus is effective in improving the level of consciousness of patients in brain coma.
分 类 号:R743[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28