司法解释立法化问题三论  

A Pathological Analysis of the Legislative Characters of Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：陈林林[1] 许杨勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2010年第6期33-38,76,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(06SFB3002)

摘　　要：最高人民法院的司法解释存在三种立法化倾向:解释内容抽象化,形式与效力的准法律化,以及起草方法的民主化。这种立法化的司法解释虽然发挥过填补法律漏洞、指导审判实践等积极作用,但也引发了解释权限合法性和解释结果公正性的质疑,并诱致了下级法院的审判路径依赖和法律体系中的人为混乱。唯有从抽象解释转向具体的案例指导,才能克服现有司法解释的弊病,让最高人民法院复位到"解释法院审判工作中具体应用法律、法令的问题"。The judicial interpretation made by the People's Supreme Court has three legislative characters,i.e.the abstraction of interpretive outcome,the quasi-law form and validity of interpretive documents,and the democratization of interpretive process.Although this kind of legislative judicial interpretation has positive functions such as filling legal gaps and supervising judicial practice,it has incurred inquiries of its legitimacy and the equity of interpretive outcome,and induced the adjudicative path-reliance of lower courts and the artificial chaos in legal system.Only by replacing the abstractive judicial interpretation by concrete cases directing can the disadvantages of contemporary judicial interpretation be eliminated,and the People's Supreme Court return to interpret the issues of law and acts application in trial process.

关 键 词：司法解释 立法化 案例指导 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]