论纳尔逊·古德曼对“分析/综合区分”的拒斥及其效应——兼谈古德曼与蒯因的差异  

On Nelson Goodman's Spurning of the "Analytic-synthetic Distinction" and its Effect ——Concurrently Discuss the Difference with W.V.O. Quine

作　　者：姬志闯[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学哲学系,河南开封475004

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2010年第6期1-5,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"纳尔逊.古德曼哲学与当代美国哲学的话语转换"(09CZX026);河南省人文社科研究中心课题的阶段性成果

摘　　要：作为20世纪中期批判和拒斥"分析/综合区分"洪流的主力,纳尔逊.古德曼立于唯名论和实用主义情景,通过一条独特的外延式意义分析路径,论证了严格"分析"的不可能,从而实现了对"分析/综合区分"的解构和拒斥。然而,古德曼并没有止于消极拒斥,而是在积极改造基础上用"解释"替代了"分析",不仅因此而肇始了后分析哲学转向,而且也因重构了认识论而实现了整个哲学话语的转换,这也正是古德曼的独特效应所在。As a main force in a onrush of animadverting and spurning the ＂analytic-synthetic distinction＂ in the middle of 20th century,Nelson Goodman argued the impossibility of strict ＂analysis＂ and dispelled and spurned the ＂analytic-synthetic distinction＂ through a unique path of extensional analysis of meaning in the scene of nominalism and pragmatism.But Goodman did not stop at this negative spurning,he actively reconstructed ＂analysis＂ and replaced it by ＂explain＂,which not only brought the inchoation of Post-analytic philosophy turn,but also reconstructed the epistemology and thus realized the transition of the saying-mode of philosophy,just this constructed Goodman＇s unique effect.

关 键 词：纳尔逊·古德曼 分析/综合区分 拒斥 效应 

分 类 号：B83-06[哲学宗教—美学]