检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李峻岭[1] 屈凤莲[1] 崔成旭[1] 王金万[1] 储大同[1]
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》1999年第1期53-54,共2页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:为观察EAP方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应,采用EAP方案(足叶乙甙、阿霉素或表阿霉素、顺铂)治疗胃癌44例,其中术后辅助性化疗20例,可评价疗效的有24例。结果完全缓解2例,部分缓解11例,总有效率54.2%。中位生存期为6.5个月(3~34个月)。化疗的主要不良反应为骨髓抑制及胃肠道反应。结果表明EAP在现阶段仍是治疗晚期胃癌较为有效的方案。To evaluate efficacy and safety profile of EAP regimen,44 patients with gastric carcinoma were treated with a combination regimen of etoposide,adriamycin(or epirubicin)and cisplatin(EAP).Among them,20 patients were in post operation adjuvant chemotherapy,another 24 patients were evaluable.The overall response rate was 54.2%(13/24),including 8.3%(2/24) complete response(CR).The median survival time for all patients was 6.5 months(range 3~34 months).Main adverse reactions were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity.This study shows that EAP regimen is active in the treatment of gastric cancer up date.The adverse reactions are tolerated in the majority of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.206.240