论文摘要IMRD和OMRC的体裁理据  

The Generic Motivation of Two Abstract Models:IMRD and OMRC

作　　者：朱汉昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中农业大学外国语学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《华中农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期123-127,共5页Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：华中农业大学外语学科科研项目(52206-083011)

摘　　要：论文摘要是论文的重要组成部分,通用的模式是IMRD,但是越来越多的学术期刊开始采用OM-RC模式。文章从问题解决模式和试验报告单入手,分别探讨IMRD和OMRC的体裁理据,并且通过实例对比分析了两种模式的异同。IMRD和OMRC分别是问题解决模式和试验报告单体裁化的结果,IMRD的构件比OMRC灵活,适合多学科的综合期刊摘要,而OMRC各项构件要求明确,易于作者和读者把握,适用于实验性较强的学术期刊摘要。对IMRD和OMRC摘要体裁理据的分析,有助于英汉研究论文体裁的认知理解,为我国科技论文摘要的规范化和国际化服务。Abstract,an integral part of a research article,usually follows the pattern of IMRD and some journals requires the OMRC structure.This article discusses the generic motivation of IMRD and OMRC by tracing their respective origins to the problem-solution pattern and the lab report format based on the analysis of samples taken from English research articles.The analysis indicates that IMRD has evolved from SPRE of the problem-solution pattern,and OMRC is the hybrid of IMRD and the lab report format,with IMRD being widely used in comprehensive academic journals or conferences for its flexibility,and OMRC being much easier for the author and the reader to manipulate due to its specific format.The exploration of IMRD and OMRC generic motivation can improve our cognitive understanding of the generic features of both Chinese and English research articles and facilitate the standardization and internationalization of the Abstract of Chinese research articles.

关 键 词：摘要 IMRD OMRC 体裁理据 

分 类 号：H152[语言文字—汉语]