检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院附属口腔医院,云南昆明650031
出 处:《昆明医学院学报》2010年第5期115-117,共3页Journal of Kunming Medical College
摘 要:目的比较后牙(前磨牙、磨牙)经两种不同类型根管封闭剂根管充填后疼痛发生情况.方法 138颗需行根管治疗的牙齿分两组,分别采用Cortisomol糊剂加牙胶尖和氧化锌丁香油糊剂加牙胶尖一次性根管充填,观察术后2周内疼痛发生情况.结果 Cortisomol糊剂组疼痛发生率1.3%,氧化锌丁香油糊剂组疼痛发生率8.06%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.01).结论 Cortisomol糊剂+牙胶尖根管充填不能减少术后疼痛的发生.Objective To evaluate clinical effects of short-term cure after root canal filling with two different kinds of materials.Methods A total of 138 teeth for root canal treatment were divided into two groups,Cortisomol + gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol paste+ gutta-percha.The occurrence of pain in 14 days after treatment were record.Results The occurrence rate of pain after root canal therapy in 14 days using Cortisomol was lower than of the group using gutta-percha and zincoxide eugenol paste with significant in difference(P 0.05) .Conclusion Root canal treatment applying Cortisomol + gutta-percha can not decrease the rate of pain occurrence after root canal filling in short period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3