检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]韶关学院法学院,广东韶关512005 [2]宁波市江北区检察院,浙江宁波315020
出 处:《韶关学院学报》2010年第5期116-119,共4页Journal of Shaoguan University
摘 要:诉讼处分权是私法领域意思自治理念的衍生物,在我国刑事诉讼中,当事人只有在自诉程序中才享有处分权。犯罪侵犯法益的可处分性是自诉程序中当事人处分实体权益的理论基础。由于存在认识上的差异,因而有必要厘清当事人处分实体权益的范围。我国当前刑事诉讼实体处分权制度还存在诸如忽视被告的能动性、处分形式缺乏多样性等弊端,这是我们必须正视并力求改进的方面。Right of disposition to prosecution is a derivative of autonomy of will philosophy of private law.In Chinese criminal procedure,only in private prosecution procedure can litigant enjoy right of disposition.The theoretical basis for a litigant in a private prosecution procedure to dispose his substantial right is that the legal interest infringed by a crime must possess the feature of being disposed.Because of difference in cognition,it is necessary to make clear what kind of subject right can be disposed by litigant.The system of right of disposition of substantial right in Chinese criminal procedure has some defects,such as the activeness of the defendant is often being neglected and the forms of deposition lack diversity,which is what we must confront and improve.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42