检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张传柱[1]
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2010年第6期652-653,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的比较网络成瘾者与非网络成瘾者的抑制能力。方法采用Stroop实验范式和负启动实验范式,比较了网络成瘾者与非网络成瘾者的有意抑制能力和无意抑制能力。结果在有意抑制能力上,非网络成瘾者的抑制能力显著高于网络成瘾者,差异具有统计学意义(RT1(0.05/2)=2.131,P=0.04<0.05;RT2(0.05/2)=2.133,P=0.04<0.05);而在无意抑制层面上,网络成瘾者与非网络成瘾者的抑制能力并没有显著性差异。结论抑制的缺损可能是造成网络成瘾的一个关键因素。Objective To compare the inhibition ability of the internet addicts with non-network addicts.Methods The stroop experimental paradigm and the negative priming paradigm were conducted to compare the inhibition ability and the automatic inhibition ability between internet addicts and non-network addicts.Results In the intention to inhibit the ability of non-network addicts,the inhibition was significantly higher than the internet addicts,the difference was statistically significant[RT1(0.05/2)=2.131,P=0.040.05;RT2(0.05/2)=2.133,P=0.040.05];while in unintentionally inhibit level,there was no significant difference.Conclusion The defect of inhidition may be a key factor causing internet addiction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15