颜师古《汉书注》“抄袭旧注”说之再检讨  

"Plagiarism of Old Annotations"of the HANSHUZHU by Yan Shigu Revisited

作　　者：王永平[1] 孙艳庆[2] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学社会发展学院,江苏扬州225002 [2]扬州大学文学院,江苏扬州225002

出　　处：《史学史研究》2010年第2期17-32,共16页Journal of Historiography

摘　　要：在学术史上,唐代颜师古的《汉书注》在倍受后人推崇的同时,也为部分学者所深相诟病。人们不断发现某些题为"师古曰"的《汉书》注文,实际上是其他《汉书》注家的成果,从而据此认定颜师古注《汉书》时曾"抄袭"他人注解。对此,指责者颇多,而证之最详,持之最力者,当为杨明照先生,其著有《汉书颜注发覆》一文。但批评颜师古"抄袭"的学者多忽视了颜注《汉书》在经历唐代长期手抄流传,及宋代以来屡经校订、刊刻所发生的变化。我们在当今通行的中华书局本《汉书》校勘记中便收集到不少误改、误衍"师古曰"的注文,并据此推测被后人指责为"抄袭"的《汉书》颜师古注文,很可能多是后人不断增补、改写的结果,颜师古似不当为此种"抄袭"负责。In the history of academy,the Annotations of HANSHU,or the HANSHUZHU written by Yan Shigu in the Tang Dynasty,was praised highly by later generations. However,it was criticized by some scholars because people gradually found that some annotations of HANSHU marked by＂Shigu says＂ were actually other authors’achievements,and accordingly it is believed that Yan Shigu copied other annotations when he annotated the HANSHU. For this,Yang Mingzhao supported this argument strongly and provided the most detailed evidence in his article Reveal of Yan＇s Annotation of the Hanshu. In fact, scholars who had criticized Yan Shigu ignored that Yan＇s annotations of the HANSHU were changed after they were spread with handwriting for a long time in the Tang Dynasty and have been revised and transcribed for many times since the Song Dynasty. We collected a lot of annotations entiled＂Shigu says＂ which were changed wrongly or were error derivatives in the Chinese collation of the HANSHU,and infered that the annotations of HANSHU by Yan Shigu been accused of＂plagiarism＂were possibly added and rewritten in later generations. Therefore,it seems that Yan Shigu should not be responsible for such ＂plagiarism＂.

关 键 词：颜师古 《汉书注》 “抄袭” 杨明照 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]