民法自然债与“中间法律行为”之可能——从“青春损失费”协议的判断与处理出发思考  

The Possibility of Natural Obligations in Civil Law and Intermediate Legal Act:From Perspective of Judgment and Handling of "Green Loss Cost"

作　　者：覃远春[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州财经学院法学院,贵州贵阳550004

出　　处：《四川文理学院学报》2010年第4期14-18,共5页Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"自然债与我国债法完善之研究"(09CFX047);中国行为法学会部级研究项目"自然债与民事法律行为理论的完善"(2009学研028)

摘　　要："青春损失费"协议的恰当判断与处理,需要借助民法自然债理论与制度。自然债受民法认可引发对相关行为的法律定位思考,传统民事法律行为理论在说明引发自然债的法律行为时存在不足,应进行适当修正。对民事法律行为的"有效性"应作广义理解,行为并非只能作有强制力的"有效"或"无效"的判断,而可以考虑"中间法律行为"的提出。围绕该行为对民事法律行为理论完善作思考,是自然债带来的诸多反思之一。The proper judgment and handling of ＂green loss cost＂ depends on the theory and system of natural obligation. The acceptance of natural obligation in civil law requires finding a suitable place for the act which gives birth to natural obligation, and the traditional theory of civil legal act has shortcomings in explaining such act and needs amendments. The validity of legal act shall be understood broadly, it is not necessary to make an alternative choice between ＂effective＂ and ＂ineffective＂ and the type of ＂intermediate le- gal act＂ can be put forward to show its nature of not full effective and not void act. Reconsidering the theory of civil legal act with ＂intermediate legal act＂ as the core is only one of reconsidering tasks inspired by natural obligation.

关 键 词：青春损失费 自然债 民事法律行为 有效性 中间法律行为 

分 类 号：X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学]