检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐梦莎[1] 王德斌[1] 柴静[1] 刘鹏程[1] 马戈[1] 洪倩[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学卫生管理学院,安徽合肥230032
出 处:《预防医学情报杂志》2010年第7期557-561,共5页Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
摘 要:目的评价国内互联网上有关儿童龋齿的信息质量。方法利用3种搜索引擎搜索2个关键词来获取互联网上与儿童龋齿相关的网页;使用自行设计的评价标准(包括资信度和内容完整性评价2个部分)做评价。结果对符合评价要求的246个中文网站做了评价,所有网站的总分均数是(6.88±0.44),网页资信度的平均分数为(3.04±0.18),网页内容完整性的平均分数为(3.85±0.36)。作者信息和作者资格的平均得分率为23.21和6.82,症状诊断和治疗用药的平均得分率为22.20和28.06。结论参与评价的网页总体得分较低。Objective To assess the quality of internet information about childhood dental caries.Methods Chinese internet information about childhood dental caries was searched by using three common used search engines in China(Baidu,Google and Yahoo).The indicators of credence and completeness were used in assessing the related information in internet.Results A total of 246 websites were retrieved and assessed.The total average score of the sites was(6.88 ±0.44) ;the average score of credence was(3.04 ±0.18) and the average score of completeness was(3.85 ±0.36).The average percent score on author information and author credence was 23.21 and 6.82 respectively.The average percent score on correctness of caries diagnosis and treatment drugs was 22.20 and 28.06 respectively.Conclusions The quality of internet information about childhood dental caries is quite low,and the quality of the information varies by different web sites(P 0.01).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117