检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余粤海[1] 邱小燕[1] 张新薇[1] 潘丽娜[1] 李朝钧[2]
机构地区:[1]深圳市罗湖区人民医院口腔中心,518001 [2]深圳市罗湖区人民医院口腔放射中心
出 处:《中国口腔种植学杂志》2010年第2期72-75,共4页Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology
摘 要:目的:临床评价两种不同表面处理的Brnemark种植体负重4-10年后的差异。方法:57例患者分为两组,于1998年9月至2003年12月间,在我院口腔中心植入Brnemark骨结合种植体共146枚,其中光滑组使用机械光滑表面种植体68枚,钛易耐组使用钛易耐表面种植体78枚。全部种植体均在2004年8月前完成修复;平均追踪84.5个月(57~125个月),观察并记录X线和临床检查结果,对数据行统计学处理。结果:6枚(光滑组5枚)种植体在负重前松动脱落,其余140枚种植体无松动,光滑组/钛易耐组种植体周骨吸收均值、PLI和SBI分别为1.1±0.6/1.2±0.4(mm)、0.58±0.40/0.49±0.62、1.11±0.57/1.13±0.58,组间差异均无统计学意义;在观察期内,光滑组/钛易耐组的存留率为87.5%/95.7%。结论:机械光滑表面和钛易耐表面的Brnemark种植体负重4-10年后,存留率分别为87.5%和95.7%,差异产生的原因可能并不是种植体表面处理,因为两组种植体在骨吸收,菌斑指数、龈沟出血指数并无统计学差异。RRRRRR。。。Objective:To evaluate the clinical differences of Brnemark implants with two different surface modification,4-10 years after occlusally loaded.Methods: From September 1998 to December 2003,57 patients accepted a total of 146 Brnemark osseointegration implants insertion,Patients were divided into two groups.In smooth group there were 68 mechanical surface implants,in TiUnite Group 78 implants.All successful osseointegrated implants had been completed restoration before August 2004.Average follow-up duration was 84.5 months (57-125 months).X ray and clinical examination results were recorded,and data were analized statistically.Results: 6 (smooth group has 5) implants losed before loading and the remaining 140 implants did not loose.The mean peri-implant bone resorption,PLI,and SBI of Smooth group / TiUnite group were 1.1±0.6/1.2±0.4 (mm),0.58 ± 0.40/0.49 ± 0.62,1.11 ± 0.57/1.13 ± 0.58,no significant difference were found betweeen the two groups.During the observation period,the retention rate of smooth group / TiUnite group was 87.5% / 95.7%.Conclusion: After occlusally loaded 4-10 years,the retention rates of smooth surface and TiUnite surface Brnemark implants were 87.5% and 95.7%.The difference may not be the result of implant surface modification,for 。 there is no statistically significance between the two groups at bone resorption,plaque index,and sulcus bleeding index.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.242.214