检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨红梅[1] 孟广彦[1] 陈忠[2] 唐济生[2] 王昕[3]
机构地区:[1]山东省济南市精神卫生中心,济南250002 [2]山东省精神卫生中心 [3]山东中医药大学第二附属医院
出 处:《精神医学杂志》2010年第3期193-194,共2页Journal of Psychiatry
摘 要:目的探讨文拉法辛合并小剂量舒必利治疗恶劣心境的疗效与不良反应。方法将济南市精神卫生中心、山东省精神卫生中心、山东中医药大学第二附属医院门诊恶劣心境患者70例分为两组。研究组35例,使用文拉法辛合用小剂量舒必利治疗;对照组35例,单用文拉法辛治疗。疗程6周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果较治疗前,治疗后各阶段的两组患者的HAMD评分均有显著性改善。两组间疗效无明显差异。研究组恶心等不良反应明显为少。结论文拉法辛合用小剂量舒必利治疗恶劣心境疗效好,不良反应减少,依从性更高。Objective To explore efficacy and safety of venlafaxine combined with sulpiride for patients with dysthy- mia. Methods A total of 70 patients with dysthymia were randomly divided into study group with venlafaxine combined with sulpiride and control group with venlafaxine for the treatment of 6 weeks. They were assessed with Hamilton Depres- sion Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD)and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale (TESS)at baseline, 1st, 2nd, 4th and 6th weekend after treatment. Results On lst,2nd, 4thweekend and 6th weekend after treatment, the scores of HAMD in two groups were all significantly lower than those in baseline. The scores of HAMD in study group had no sig- nificant differences compared with control group. The side effects in study group were significantly lower than those in control group. Conclusion Venlafaxine combined with sulpiride are effective to improve the symptoms of patients with dysthymia with lower adverse effects and good compliance.
分 类 号:R749.7[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3