检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李近磊[1] 王嘉怡[1] 迟丹怡[1] 朱倩[1] 王轶[1] 付文焕[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属华山医院药剂科,上海市200050
出 处:《中国药房》2010年第25期2380-2382,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:建立复方克林霉素凝胶微生物限度检查法,并进行方法验证。方法:根据《中国药典》2005年版二部附录微生物限度的检查方法即常规法、培养基稀释法和薄膜过滤法,对复方克林霉素凝胶进行方法验证,通过比较回收率来确定适宜的检查方法。结果:采用常规法试验,样品对试验菌回收率均低于70%,且不能检出控制菌。采用培养基稀释法试验,样品对试验菌回收率虽大于70%,但低于稀释剂回收率。采用薄膜过滤法试验,各试验菌回收率均大于90%,且控制菌生长良好,可基本消除复方克林霉素凝胶的抑菌作用。结论:采用薄膜过滤法检查复方克林霉素凝胶微生物限度方法有效、可行。OBJECTIVE:To establish microbial limit test for Compound clindamycin hydrochloride gel and to carry out the validation of three methods.METHODS:According to the appendices volumeⅡof Chinese Pharmacopeia(edition 2005),microbial limit test which contained routine test,medium dilution method and membrane-filter method was adopted to validate Compound clindamycin hydrochloride gel.Recoveries of three methods were compared to make sure the suitable validation method.RESULTS:In routine test,recovery of trial bacteria was lower than 70%and controlled bacteria couldn't be found out.In medium di-lution method,recovery of trial bacteria was higher than 70%and still lower than the recovery of diluents.In membrane-filter method,recovery of trial bacteria was higher than 90%,and controlled bacteria grew well.Membrane-filter method could eliminate inhibition effect of Compound clindamycin hydrochloride gel on bacteria.CONCLUSION:Membrane-filter method is effective and practical for microbial limit test of Compound clindamycin hydrochloride gel.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28