检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王勇[1]
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2010年第4期154-160,共7页Law and Social Development
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目"中国传统犯罪构成理论发展史纲"(09YJC820043)
摘 要:基于法律移植的基本原理反思中国犯罪构成理论的三次变迁,表明移植域外的犯罪构成理论是可行的。建国后我国采用四要件犯罪构成理论在当时是历史的必然,而以当下中国社会的现实条件观之,四要件犯罪构成理论则凸显其对人权保障之不足,因此,目前主张通过法律移植改造我国传统犯罪构成理论具有合理性。但是,法律移植并不是改造我国传统四要件犯罪构成理论的唯一路径。我国犯罪构成理论的走向存在两种可能:一是直接移植引进三阶层体系取代四要件理论,一是重新阐释四要件理论以适应新的观念。Considering the three evolutions in the theory of crime composition in China based on the theory of transplant of law, we may say that it is feasible to transplant the theory of crime composition from other countries. At the beginning of the founding of PRC, it is natural to employ the theory of four factors. However, in the social status today in China, this theory shows the inadequate of human rights protection in China. Therefore, the renewal of such theory by import other theories from other countries is also justifiable. But there are actually two approaches to solve such problems instead of only one : to import the theory of three factors to replace the former one, or, a new interpretation of the traditional theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28