检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海口腔医学》1999年第1期11-12,共2页Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的探讨三种临床常见的不同的酸蚀后牙面处理方法对托槽粘接效果的影响。方法对30例气水枪冲洗,湿棉球擦拭及酒精棉球擦拭等三种不同酸蚀后牙面处理方法的临床托槽脱落率及粘接剂残留指数ARI进行回顾性统计比较。结果气水枪冲洗酸蚀牙面组托槽脱落率最低,ARI计分最高;湿棉球擦拭酸蚀牙面组及以酒精棉球擦拭酸蚀牙面组托槽脱落率较高,ARI计分较低,后二者与前者相比,托槽脱落率存在着显著差异。结论该结果提示。Objective To inquire into the influence of three different treatment of the etched enamel on bracket bonding effect.Methods Compared the bracket bonding failure rate and ARI counts of 30 cases which treat the etched enamel surface with 5s air water gun rinsing,wet cotton ball wiping and alcohol cotton ball wiping respectively.Results The bracket bonding failure rate of the group which rinse the etched enamel 5s with air water gun is the lowest one.There are statistically significant difference between this group and two others.The ARI count of this group is higher than that of others.Conclusion The results suggest that rinse the etched enamel with the air water gun is a very important step to prevent the bracket bonding failure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15