检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学西南医院两南眼科医院,重庆400038
出 处:《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》2010年第3期218-220,共3页Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基 金:基金项目:国家“十一五”科技支撑计划资助项目(2007BAI18B09)
摘 要:目的比较硬性透气性角膜接触镜(RGPCL)、渐进多焦镜、单光眼镜对青少年近视发展的延缓作用。方法青少年近视患者85例(170眼),年龄9~14岁,屈光度-1.00~4.OHDD。将这些患者分为3组给予不同矫正方式:RGPCL组30例,散光均低于1/2球镜;渐进镜组30例,均为近距内隐斜伴调节滞后≥+0.25D;单光镜对照组25例。3组患者基本资料的差异均无统计学意义.均要求每日配戴6h以上。戴镜前和戴镜后1年,对各组眼生物参数进行测量和比较。对屈光度、角膜曲率、眼轴长度、前房深度、晶状体厚度等变化值进行单因素方差分析。结果随访1年后.3组近视患者的等效屈光度均有增长的趋势,RGPCL组增长(-0.48±0.42)D,渐进镜组增长(-0.54±0.36)D,单光镜组增长(-0.93±0.53)D,3组之间差异有统计学意义(F=29.36,,P=0.01),其中单光镜组屈光度增加最多。3组患者的眼轴均有增长,角膜曲率均有变平的趋势,前房深度均有增加,品状体厚度也有变薄的趋势,但各组间变化差异均无统计学意义。结论与单光框架眼镜比较,RGPCL有延缓近视进展的作用,渐进多焦镜能延缓近距内隐斜患者的近视增长,但两者均不能阻止近视进展。Objective To compare rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCL), progressive muhifocal lenses, and single-vision glasses in the role of delaying the development of myopia. Methods Eight-five cases (170 eyes) 9 to 14 years old young people with -1.00--4.00 D of myopia were divided into 3 groups. The RGPCL group (30 cases) with astigmatism less than 1/2 of spherical; the multifocal lenses group (30 cases) with near esophoria and accommodative lag ≥+0.25 D; and the single-vision glasses group (25 cases). Basic information of the 3 groups showed no significant differences. Patients were required to wear their corrective lenses 6 hours a day. Biological parameters were measured and compared after one year. One-Way ANOVA was used to analyzed the data. Results Myopia progression was found in all 3 groups. The equivalent refractive increase in myopia in the RGPCL group was (-0.48±0.42)D, in the muhifoeal lenses group was (-0.54±0.36)D, and in the single-vision glasses group was (-0.93±0.53)D. Comparisons for the 3 groups differed significantly (F=29.36, P=0.01). Axial length and anterior chamber depth increased and there was a tendency for the corneal curvature to flatten and the lens to become thinner in all 3 groups. However, the differences in the changes for the groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion Compared to single-vision glasses, progressive multifocal lenses for near esophoria and RGPCL lenses may slow the progression of myopia. But both methods can not prevent myopia progression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222