论我国刑事鉴定项目CNAS认可的证据法定位  

CNAS's Accreditation on Criminal Authentication:Based on Evidence Law

作　　者：张斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《现代法学》2010年第4期113-119,共7页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"科学证据采信基本原理研究"(05CFX018)

摘　　要：我国刑事鉴定项目CNAS认可是一新生事物,它的主要认可依据是司法鉴定机构参加的能力验证,这需要相应的能力验证实施方案和结果处理手段作为保障。现阶段我国能力验证活动存在验证项目代表性、经验型鉴定验证可行性、能力验证技术方法统一性三大问题,在证据法上不宜将CNAS认可作为刑事鉴定结论的可信性要件来看待,而应将其定位在证据能力层面。刑事鉴定项目CNAS认可的证据法意义是,刑事鉴定结论的出具人(包括鉴定机构和鉴定人)对于此结论所在的检测项目具有基本的技术检测能力。CNAS认可的刑事鉴定结论,并不当然的具备充分解释案件专业问题的法律效力。CNAS＇s accreditation on criminal authentication,a rather new matter,is heavily dependent on judicial expertise institutions＇participation and is guaranteed with adequate proficiency testing programs and results processing measures.Three problems now exist in China＇s present proficiency testing：inadequacy of testing project,infeasibility of experiential authentication and inconsistency of techniques.It is inappropriate to hold the CNAS＇s accreditation as the conclusion of judicial expertise,rather it should be considered at the level of weight of evidence.In evidence law,the key point of CNAS＇s accreditation is that the maker of the criminal authentication（including the authenticating institution and expert） should be technically competent to reach the conclusion of the test.CNAS＇s accreditation on criminal authentication is not necessarily of legal effect in interpreting professional issues concerning criminal cases.

关 键 词：刑事鉴定 CNAS认可 能力验证 证据能力 

分 类 号：D915.33[政治法律—诉讼法学]