检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗红霞[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省第四人民医院口腔科,四川成都610016
出 处:《四川医学》2010年第7期931-932,共2页Sichuan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的评价ProTaper镍钛锉预备磨牙根管的临床效果。方法选取96颗患有牙髓炎的磨牙,随机分为两组,分别使用ProTaper镍钛锉和不锈钢K锉预备根管,使用侧压法充填根管,记录器械分离数和术后疼痛例数,根据X线片评价根管预备效果。结果两组器械预备根管后,ProTaper组根管形态良好率为91.9%,不锈钢K锉组为51.1%,两者差异有统计学意义。ProTaper组术后疼痛反应的比例明显低于不锈钢K锉组(P<0.05)。两组器械分离数的差异无统计学意义。结论 ProTaper预备磨牙根管的成形效果好,术后疼痛反应少。Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of ProTaper in preparation of molars′root canals.Methods 96 molars were randomly divided into two groups and prepared by ProTaper and stainless steel K files.All canals were obturated with lateral condensation method.The incidence of instrument seperation and post-operative pain were recorded.The efficiency of preparation was analyzed with radiograph.Results In ProTaper group,91.9% of the canals were achieved continuous funnel shapes after preparation,while 51.1% of the canals were achieved in stainless steel K files group.The difference between two groups was statistically significant.There was more post-operative pain in the stainless steel K files group than in the ProTaper group(P0.05).There was no statistically significance of instrument seperation between two groups.Conclusion ProTaper performed good shaping ability in molars′ root canals and generated less post-operative pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222