检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《心理科学》2010年第4期823-826,共4页Journal of Psychological Science
摘 要:以159名大学生为被试,考察三种框架下,人格因素对框架效应下决策的影响。结果表明,风险决策框架中,敢为者倾向于选择高风险选项,忧虑者倾向于选择低风险选项;女生更容易出现框架效应。目标框架下,忧虑越高,越易出现框架效应。在归因框架中,支配性越强,越倾向于做"健康"判断;敢为性越强者,越倾向于做出"安全"判断;敏感、忧虑、内向者,倾向于做悲观判断。自律性越高者框架效应越小;男生更容易出现框架效应。The present research explored the effects of personality traits on decision making in different types of frameing with 159 students as subjects. The results showed that in the risk-choice framing, adventurous judges .always made highly risky choices, but worrying judges preferred choices with lower risks, and females had much more discrepancy than males. Moreover, in the goal framing, anxiety was correlated to decision-making discrepancy. Finally, in the risk-choice framing, the dominating judges were prone to believe others are healthy, while the adventurous judges inclined to presume others are safe, and those who were sensitive, anxious or introversive were prone to be pessimistic. And fewer framing effects could be observed in autonomic students and females.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28