检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东深圳市康宁医院,518020
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2010年第4期249-251,共3页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
摘 要:目的:探讨奎硫平与奥氮平对血管性痴呆(VD)精神行为症状的疗效及不良反应。方法:将88例VD患者分为奎硫平组与奥氮平组,治疗8周。治疗前、治疗2、4和8周以简易智力状况检查表(MMSE)和日常生活能力量表(ADL)评定患者痴呆状况;以痴呆病理行为评定量表(BEHAVE-AD)评定疗效,治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:两组治疗后BEHAVE-AD评分显著减少(P<0.01),MMSE评分与治疗前比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)、ADL有明显改善(P<0.05),两组间比较差异无显著性(P>0.05);奥氮平组的锥体外系反应、口干、头昏、嗜睡、体质量增加、便秘较奎硫平组显著(P<0.01)。结论:奎硫平与奥氮平对VD患者的精神行为症状均有较好的疗效,奎硫平安全性更高。Objective: To explore the efficacy and side effects of quetiapine and olanzapine on behavioral and psychological symptoms of vascular dementia (VD) . Method: 88 VD patients were divided into quetiapine group and olanzapine group for 8 week treatments. Activities of daily living scale (ADL) as well as minimental state examination (MMSE) were used to assess dementia status,behavioral pathology in Alzheimer's disease rating scale (BEHAVE-AD) to assess efficacy,and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) to assess side effects at baseline,week 2,4 and 8. Results: The two groups did not show significant decreases on MMSE (P 0. 05) but on BEHAVE-AD and ADL (P 0. 05) after treatment. There were no significant differences found in two groups. Side effects such as extrapyramidal reactions,thirst,dizziness,drowsiness,weight gain and constipation were worse in olanzapine group than in quetiapine group(P 0. 01) . Conclusion: Quetiapine and olanzapine are effective for improving behavioral and psychological symptoms of VD,and quetiapine has better safety than olanzapine.
分 类 号:R749.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.254.28