检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林跃泉 陈祖金[1] 范红[1] 聂红[1] 袁洪彬[1]
机构地区:[1]四川遂宁市民康医院(遂宁市精神卫生中心),629000
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2010年第4期268-269,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
摘 要:目的:探讨归脾丸治疗精神分裂症后抑郁的辅助治疗作用。方法:60例精神分裂症后抑郁患者随机分为归脾丸与米氮平合用组与单用米氮平组,疗程8周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)和治疗中出现症状的量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:归脾丸与米氮平合用组有效率93%显著高于单用米氮平组73%(P<0.05);合用组HAMD评分降分显著较多(P<0.01)。结论:归脾丸对精神分裂症后抑郁症状有一定的增效作用,不良反应未见增加。Objective: To explore the efficacy and adverse reaction of Guipi pills (integrative Chinese medicine) on the treatment of past-schizophrenia depression. Method: The sixty patients with past-schizophrenia depression were randomly assigned to Guipi group (treated with Guipi pills plus mirtazapine) and mirtazapine group (treated with mirtazapine) for 8 weeks. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by Hamilton depression rating scale for depression (HAMD) ,positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and the adverse reaction by treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) . Results: Guipi group showed effective rate of 93% which significantly higher than 73% of mirtazapine group(P 0. 05) . The HAMD scores decreased significantly more in Guipi group than in mirtazapine group(P 0. 01) . Conclusion: The Guipi pills are superior to mirtazapine in the treatment of past-schizophrenia depression.
分 类 号:R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3