检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张文礼[1]
机构地区:[1]宜宾市第一人民医院消化内科,四川省宜宾644000
出 处:《中国基层医药》2010年第15期2020-2021,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的 评价胃镜下钛夹和注射肾上腺素联合钛夹的方法治疗急性非静脉曲张上消化道出血的疗效.方法 经胃镜检查确诊为急性非静脉曲张上消化道出血患者65例,随机分为钛夹组(31例)、注射肾上腺素联合钛夹组(注射联合钛夹组,34例),对出血灶进行治疗,评价两种治疗方法的止血率和再出血率的差异.结果 注射联合钛夹组和钛夹组的所有患者均首次止血成功,止血率均为l00%;钛夹组有6例发生再次出血,再出血率19.4%,注射联合钛夹组中有1例发生再出血,再出血率2.9%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 胃镜下注射肾上腺素联合钛夹治疗非静脉曲张上消化道出血疗效可靠,优于单纯钛夹治疗.Objective To evaluate the curative effect of titanium clips and adrenaline injection by gastroen-doscopy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding ( ANVUGIB). Methods 65 patients with ANVUGIB were randomly divided into group of titanium clips(31 cases) and group of injection combined with titanium clips(34 cases) for treatment of bleeding. The rate of curative effect of hemostatic and rehaemorrhagia was compared. Results All the patients of the two groups were succeed at the first time hematischesis, the hemostatic rates were all 100%. The titanium clips group has 6 cases rebleeding,and the rehaemorrhagia rate was 19.4% ,the injection combined with titanium clips group has 1 case rebleeding, and the rehaemorrhagia rate was 2. 9%. There was significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions The curative effect of injection with titanium clips was reliable, and was superior to treatment with titanium clips alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.165