检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘磊[1,2] 赵鸿鹰[1,2] 杨柳[1,2] 孙晶波[1,2] 江荣科[1,2] 朱丹丹[1,2]
机构地区:[1]大庆市总医院集团龙南医院 [2]齐齐哈尔医学院第五附属医院血液肿瘤科,黑龙江大庆163453
出 处:《黑龙江医学》2010年第8期594-596,共3页Heilongjiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨TC与CP化疗方案治疗晚期卵巢上皮癌的不良反应与临床疗效。方法对38例卵巢上皮癌患者随机行TC(21例)或CP(17例)化疗方案,比较两组临床疗效与不良反应的差异。结果两组内Ⅲ期疗效均好于Ⅳ期,差异有显著意义(P<0.05),两组间Ⅲ期与Ⅳ期同期比较疗效差异有显著意义(P<0.05);两组骨髓抑制分级差异无显著意义(P>0.05);胃肠道反应Ⅲ级发生率CP与TC组比较差异有显著意义(P<0.05);神经毒性及过敏反应的发生率,两者之间差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。结论 TC化疗方案疗效优于CP方案,而且毒副作用小,是目前治疗卵巢上皮癌首选化疗方案。Objective To explore the adverse reaction and therapeutic effect of TC and CP chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer.Methods 38 cases of ovarian cancer patients were randomly performed TC(21 cases) or CP(17 cases) chemotherapy program.Comparing the two groups in the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions difference.Results Effect of stage Ⅲ within the two groups were better than in Stage Ⅳ,the difference was significant(P0.05),between the two groups in stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ efficacy over the same period there were significant differences(P0.05).Two groups of bone marrow suppression was no significant difference in grade(P0.05).Gastrointestinal reactions grade Ⅲ incidence of CP compared with the TC group was significant difference(P0.05);Neurological toxicity and allergic reactions difference between the incidence of no significant(P0.05).Conclusion TC chemotherapy program might be more effective than CP program,and the toxic side effects,should be currently the preferred treatment of ovarian epithelial cancer chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38