影响我国刑事抗辩事由证明责任分配的因素  

Discussion on the Burden of Proof of Criminal Defend

作　　者：胡忠惠[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东工商学院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2010年第3期48-50,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

基　　金：山东省教育厅人文社科研究计划项目"证明责任分配问题研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目标准号:J08WD09)

摘　　要：违法阻却和责任阻却抗辩事由的证明责任由控方还是被告方承担,可以从刑事推定的适用、犯罪构成理论、诉讼模式的差异以及价值权衡等诸多角度进行分析。通过对这些因素的考量,得出我国刑事抗辩事由的客观证明责任由控方承担的结论。In accordance with the principle of presumption of innocence,the burden of Proof of the guilt of the accused is distributed to the prosecution.However,for convenience,policyand other reasons,certain elements of crime may be distributed to the accused.Which side responsible the burden of proof of criminal defend,should consider the application of the criminal presumption,constitute of crime,the value and so on.Through consideration these factors,the prosecution should been distributed the objective burden of proof of our criminal defend.

关 键 词：刑事证明责任 抗辩事由 证明责任倒置 客观证明责任 主观证明责任 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]