检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申建红[1] 刘瑛[1,2] 王志强[1] 李春祥[3]
机构地区:[1]青岛理工大学管理学院,青岛266520 [2]青岛理工大学商学院,青岛266520 [3]上海大学土木系,上海200072
出 处:《青岛理工大学学报》2010年第4期36-41,共6页Journal of Qingdao University of Technology
基 金:山东省自然科学基金资助项目(2009ZRA02063)
摘 要:现役高层建筑动力响应的实测与参数识别对结构动态数据资料的补充和设计准确性的校验是十分必要的.首先回顾了基于HHT和WT识别结构动力参数的基本原理;接着,基于高层建筑动力响应的实测数据进行了结构固有频率和阻尼比的识别.结果表明,对结构固有频率和低阶阻尼比的识别两者都具有较高的准确性;而对于高阶阻尼比的识别,两者有较大差别.对于固有频率呈密集分布结构的动力参数识别,WT方法通过调整小波中心频率而实现频率分离,因而WT方法更为简单有效.Both full-scale measurement of dynamic responses and identification of dynamic parameters of tall buildings can certainly supplement the structural dynamic data and evaluate the accuracy of structural design.In this paper,the fundamental principles of both HHT and WT applications to the identification of structural model parameters are first reviewed.Then,the identification of both the natural frequencies and damping ratios is carried out by using the full-scale measurement of dynamic responses of a tall building.The results show that both HHT and WT can identify the natural frequencies and lower damping ratios of the tall buildings quite accurately,but the difference consists in the identification of higher damping ratios.The WT separates the closely-spaced natural frequencies by adjusting the central frequency of the wavelets.As a result,the WT approach is simpler and more effective compared with the HHT approach when the natural frequencies of structures are close to each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28