结肠灌注透析对提高肠道清洁度的临床护理研究  

Study of Nursing for Intestinal Cleansing with CTJ-B Colon Perfusion Dialysis Treatment Machine

作　　者：唐凤元[1] 黄玉晓[1] 王杏[1] 温日萍[1] 廖杏菊[1] 韦婷[1] TANG Feng-yuan, HUANG Yu-xiao, WANG Xing,et al （Department of Gastro-intestinal surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou 545005,China）

机构地区：[1]广西医科大学第四附属医院胃肠外科,广西柳州545005

出　　处：《医学信息》2010年第18期3359-3360,共2页Journal of Medical Information

摘　　要：目的观察两种不同肠道清洁方法对肠道手术的影响,寻求更为安全、有效地清洁肠道的方法。方法选取100例确诊肠道疾病需手术治疗的住院患者,按序号单双分为实验组（50例）和对照组（50例）,实验组采用结肠灌注透析疗机,对照组应用人工清洁灌肠法,分别观察各组患者的肠道清洁度、不良反应的发生率及术后肠功能恢复的时间。结果实验组肠道清洁有效率98%,不良反应发生率6%,肠功能恢复的时间提前1～2d;对照组有效率76%,不良反应发生率37%,肠功能恢复的时间延长。两组结果比较差异具有显著性意义（均P﹤0.01）。结论结肠灌注透析疗机清洁肠道,效果显著,不良反应发生率低,术后肠功能恢复快,可操作性强,可作为肠道手术前肠道准备的一种常规方法。Objective To observe the effects of two intestinal preparation methods on intestinal operation so as to find a safer and more effective method to clean intestine. Methods 100 cases with gastrointestinal diseases for operation were randomized into experimental group （n=50）and control group（n-=50）.In the experimental group, the patients received colon perfusion dialysis with machine and the patients received manual cleaning enema. The cleaning degree, side effects and recovery time of intestinal function after operation were compared between the two groups.Results In the experimental group, clean rate was 98%, side effect was 6% against 76% and 37% respectively in the control group. The recovery time of intestinal function in the experimental group was 1-2 days earlier than that in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups （P〈 0.01）. Conclusion The colon perfusion dialysis machine cleans the intestine better with less side effects and quick recovery of the intestinal function, which is easy and can be a routine method for preoperational intestinal preparation.

关 键 词：肠道手术 肠道准备 结肠灌注透析疗法 护理研究 

分 类 号：R574.62[医药卫生—消化系统;医药卫生—临床医学;医药卫生—内科学]