检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:艾佳慧[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院 [2]北京大学光华管理学院
出 处:《中国法律(中英文版)》2010年第4期44-49,102,共7页China Law
摘 要:2003年春,经媒体披露,因未携带身份证件而含冤死在收容遣送所的大学生孙志刚的悲惨遭遇激发了公众积蓄已久的对收容遣送制度的强烈不满和愤怒,“三博士”和“五学者”先後上书之後,国务院废止实施了21年的《收容遣送办法》代之以新的《救助管理办法入由于通过民情民意和社会舆论有效实现了促进政府和立法者审视、检讨和废止既有法规的目的,在很大程度上,“孙志刚案件”开启了以个案影响法治的影响性诉讼的先河。In the spring of 2003, the college student Sun Zhigang died in the detention and repatriation center because he forgot to carry proof of identification with him. Exposed by the media, the tragedy provoked anger and backlash in the general public against the institution of accommodating and sending back the homeless. When three doctors and five scholars made proposals concerning the case to the government in close succession, the State Council scraped the Method of Accommodating and Sending Back the Homeless, which had been in force for 21 years, and replaced it with the Method and Management of Relief. In this case, the will of people and the public opinion have made the government and legislators to investigate, review and abolish existing laws. In this sense, the case of Sun Zhigang set a precedent for impact litigation, in which an individual case has a bearing on the rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229