检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京军区总医院消化内科
出 处:《中国新药杂志》1999年第4期248-250,共3页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
摘 要:目的:比较5氨基水杨酸(5ASA)和柳氮磺胺吡啶(SASP)治疗轻、中型溃疡性结肠炎的临床疗效与不良反应。方法:于2年内连续收集经结肠镜确诊的溃疡性结肠炎患者40例。A组20例poSASP4g/d;B组20例,其中14例po5ASA4g/d,6例直肠栓剂1g/d,疗程均为30d。结果:A组中4例因不良反应未完成疗程,2例未复查肠镜,余14例中6例有效(42.85%),8例无效。B组中无1例因不良反应停药,14例口服5ASA患者中10例有效(71.42%)。两组比较,P>0.05;栓剂6例中4例有效(66.67%),与A组比较,P>0.05。结论:SASP与5ASA治疗轻、中型溃疡性结肠炎,疗效相近。OBJECTIVE AND METHOD:In order to compare the efficacy and ADRs of 5 ASA with that of SASP,40 patients with diagnosed ulcerative colitis were allocated to receive oral SAPA 4 g/d for 30 days ( n =20),oral 5 ASA 4 g/d for 30 days( n =14)or 5 ASA suppository 1 g/d for 30 days( n =6).RESULTS:In SASP group:6 patients were response to the treatment (42.85%) and 8 patients didn't,4 patients didn't complete the trial because of ADRs,and 2 patients refused to receive colonoscope diagnose,In 5 ASA treated patients:10 in oral group were effective(71.42%) and 4 in suppository group were effective(66.67%).CONCLUSION:The efficacy of 5 ASA and SASP were similar in treatment of ulcerative colitis but the ADRs of the former are significantly less than that of the later.
关 键 词:溃疡性结肠炎 5-氨基水杨酸 柳氨磺胺吡啶 治疗
分 类 号:R574.620.5[医药卫生—消化系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.232