检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]唐山市协和医院口腔颌面外科,河北唐山063000
出 处:《口腔颌面外科杂志》2010年第4期266-267,共2页Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
摘 要:目的:比较盐酸米诺环素复合明胶海绵与碘仿纱条治疗干槽症的疗效。方法:58例确诊为干槽症的患者经常规清创后,随机均分为2组。实验组牙槽窝内置入盐酸米诺环素复合明胶海绵;对照组填塞碘仿纱条,随访比较其疗效。结果:组间比较[实验组/对照组:优(例)23/16;良(例)6/11;可(例)0/2],Kruskal-Wallis检验法检验,疗效评价等级为"优"的实验组病例数多于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:盐酸米诺环素复合明胶海绵对干槽症的疗效优于碘仿纱条。Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects between minocycline hydrochloride ointment/ absorbable gelatin sponge and iodoform gauze on the treatment of dry socket. Methods: 58 patients with dry socket were randomly allocated into two groups, 29 patients in experiment group were treated with minocycline hydrochloride ointment/ absorbable gelatin sponge in the tooth socket after debridement, the control group were placed with iodoform gauze. Results: Curative effect of experimental group / control group were excellent (cases) 23/16; good (cases) 6 / 11 cases; may (cases) 0 / 2. The results of Kruskal-Wallis test was P〈0.05, there were significant difference in the case number between two groups at curative effect of excellent. The proportion of the evaluation level was better in the experiment group. Conclusion: The minocycline hydrochloride ointment/absorbable gelatin sponge seems to be better in the treatment of dry socket.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15